What does Mark 7:11 mean?
ESV: But you say, ‘If a man tells his father or his mother, “Whatever you would have gained from me is Corban”’ (that is, given to God)—
NIV: But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is Corban (that is, devoted to God)--
NASB: but you say, ‘If a person says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban (that is, given to God),’
CSB: But you say, 'If anyone tells his father or mother: Whatever benefit you might have received from me is corban' " (that is, an offering devoted to God),
NLT: But you say it is all right for people to say to their parents, ‘Sorry, I can’t help you. For I have vowed to give to God what I would have given to you.’
KJV: But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
NKJV: But you say, ‘If a man says to his father or mother, “Whatever profit you might have received from me is Corban”—’ (that is, a gift to God),
Verse Commentary:
The concept of corban is understandably confusing since it is not defined in the Bible. It is a type of vow that devotes something to God, or the temple, which bans its use by another. Jesus refers to a case where a son declares that his property and possessions shall not be used to benefit his parents, but rather given to the temple. Or, at least, by "declaring" as much, whether or not it was physically given to the temple. It's unclear why such an oath would be made, but it could have been made in the heat of an argument and shortly after regretted. The vow does not mean that the property must be donated to the priests or another worthy cause, just that it cannot be used to benefit those whom it might have belonged to otherwise.
Of course, the oath itself breaks both the commandment to honor one's father and mother (Exodus 20:12; Deuteronomy 5:16) and the law forbidding a child to curse his parents (Exodus 21:17; Leviticus 20:9). But to renege on the vow would be against Numbers 30:2 which states, "If a man vows a vow to the LORD, or swears an oath to bind himself by a pledge, he shall not break his word. He shall do according to all that proceeds out of his mouth."
The Jewish elders had to determine which was worse: to abandon your responsibility to your parents or to break an oath? According to the oral law, the oath is paramount. Even if someone wanted to support their parents, the scribes and Pharisees would forbid it (Mark 7:12) if they'd declared some or all of their property as corban. In doing so, they use manmade tradition and legalism to nullify God's commandment and the intent behind it (Mark 7:13).
We see this today in any church that encourages members to make a pledge of money or time and holds to that pledge even if circumstances change. If someone pledges to donate to a new building but loses his job, he should not be held to that pledge. If a woman promises to teach for a year but is unexpectedly overwhelmed by family demands, the church should do what it can to support her, not demand her service. Of course, Jesus would suggest that we just don't make vows (Matthew 5:33–37).
Verse Context:
Mark 7:1–13 argues that the traditions of Jewish elders are twisted interpretations of the Mosaic Law that hide the purpose of that law. Washing is a particular requirement of priests and has nothing to do with ensuring the ceremonial cleanness of a meal. And keeping a rash oath does not relieve a child from the commandment to care for his parents. In their attempt to add to the ceremonial law, the elders subtract from the moral law. They find that anyone who attempts to find salvation through works will end up stumbling on Christ (Romans 9:30–33). This story is also found in Matthew 15:1–9.
Chapter Summary:
Jesus counters another traditional error from the scribes and Pharisees, explaining that food in and of itself does not make a person unclean. Rather, it is the intent of the heart that matters to God. He specifically condemns traditions which effectively undo the original intent of God's commands. Jesus heals the daughter of a persistent Gentile woman, and a man suffering from deafness and a speech impediment.
Chapter Context:
After showing His authority over demons, death, and physics, Jesus asserts His superiority over manmade traditions. For generations, Jewish religious leaders have added to the Law in an attempt to keep the nation holy. Such traditions, however, serve to make the leaders look good but unnecessarily burden the people. Jesus argues in word and action that any law that dismisses love is either misinterpreted or manmade.
Book Summary:
The Gospel of Mark emphasizes both Jesus' servanthood and His role as the promised Messiah: the Son of God. This is done through a concise, action-packed style. Mark provides relatively few details, instead focusing on actions and simple statements. This relates to the Gospel's authorship, which is believed to be based on the memories of the apostle Peter. These include many of Jesus' miracles, in contrast to other Gospels which include many more of Jesus' teachings and parables. Mark also makes frequent mention of Jesus' ministry being misunderstood by others.
Accessed 5/6/2024 2:42:01 AM
© Copyright 2002-2024 Got Questions Ministries. All rights reserved.
Text from ESV, NIV, NASB, CSB, NLT, KJV, NKJV © Copyright respective owners, used by permission.
